And why, by the way, did it take Arabs to do what people here should have done a long time ago?

One of the things I've suggested is that it may be that more 9/11s are necessary.

A random group of homeless people under a bridge would be far more intellectually sound and principled than anything I've encountered at the university so far.

Guess what? By virtue of being American, you are not innocent.

I have never said that people “should” engage in armed attacks on the United States, but that such attacks are a natural and unavoidable consequence of unlawful U.S. policy.

Among the worst examples is that of the Alberni Indian Residential School (British Columbia) where, during the 1920s, children caught talking Indian suffered the hideous ordeal of having sewing needles pushed through their tongues.

It is the collective responsibility of the citizens in a modern state to ensure by all means necessary that its government adheres to the rule of law, not just domestically, but internationally. There are no bystanders. No one is entitled to an 'apolitical' exemption from such obligation. Where default occurs, either by citizens endorsement of official criminality or by the failure of citizens to effectively oppose it, liability is incurred by all