And when you get an eminent journal like Time magazine complaining, as it often has, that to the young writers of today life seems short on rewards and that what they write is a product of their own neuroses, in its silly way the magazine is merely stating the status quo and obvious truth. The good writing of any age has always been the product of someone's neurosis, and we'd have a mighty dull literature if all the writers that came along were a bunch of happy chuckleheads.

We would have to settle for the elegant goal of becoming ourselves.

I think that one of the compelling themes of fiction is this confrontation between good and evil.

A great book should leave you with many experiences, and slightly exhausted at the end. You live several lives while reading.

I think that the best of my generation...have reversed the customary rules of the game and have grown more radical as they have gotten older - a disconcerting but healthy sign. To be sure, there are many youngish old fogies around and even the most illustrious of these, William Buckley, is blessed by a puzzling, recondite but undeniable charm, almost as if beneath that patrician exterior an egalitarian was signaling to get out.

This was not judgment day - only morning. Morning: excellent and fair.

we each devise our means of escape from the intolerable.