You know, what Einstein has just said isn't so stupid.

When one analyzes the pre-conscious step to concepts, one always finds ideas which consist of 'symbolic images.' The first step to thinking is a painted vision of these inner pictures whose origin cannot be reduced only and firstly to the sensual perception but which are produced by an 'instinct to imagining' and which are re-produced by different individuals independently, i.e. collectively... But the archaic image is also the necessary predisposition and the source of a scientific attitude. To a total recognition belong also those images out of which have grown the rational concepts.

The fact that the author thinks slowly is not serious, but the fact that he publishes faster than he thinks is inexcusable.

Well, our friend Dirac, too, has a religion, and its guiding principle is "God does not exist and Dirac is His prophet."

Aristotle was by far a less able thinker than Plato ... he was completely overwhelmed by Plato.

It isn't right. It isn't even wrong.

I refuse to believe that God is a weak left-hander.