The problem I see with utilitarianism, or any form of consequentialism, is not that it gets the wrong answers to moral questions. I think just about any moral theory, worked out intelligently, and applied with good judgment, would get just about the same results as any other.

We can't coherently deny, or even decline to affirm, that we are free.

What I most fear now is that within a century or so there may not be any human future at all.

I don't think Kant's approach to religion is any longer viable in its original form. But that does not mean it is simply wrong or that we cannot learn from it.

As Kant says, the contribution of any common laborer would be greater than that of the greatest philosopher unless the philosopher makes some contribution to establishing the rights of humanity.

Many who are committed to reason and science have turned against religion altogether and treat it with fear and contempt.

The moral law is simply the way we think our own freedom as self-determination.