We can't coherently deny, or even decline to affirm, that we are free.

Kant does not think that the silly commandment "universalize your maxims" is the be-all and end-all of ethics or that it provides us with some sort of general decision procedure that is supposed to tell us what to do under all circumstances.

In general, those who defend capitalism are basically out of touch with reality.

I think the contribution people make is not proportionate to their fame or success. In fact, I think the relation is often inverse.

As long as the Republican party exists in its present form, our nation cannot endure as a free society. Still worse, under their policies the human race is being rapidly propelled toward its extinction.

If being "iron headed" is to be lacking such feelings, then Kant's position is that an ironheaded person could not be a moral agent because such a person would not be rational.

We can make mistakes about what we ought to do, and these are not the same as making bad decisions about what to do.