When conservative judges strike down laws, it's because of what's in the Constitution. When liberal judges strike down laws (or impose new laws), it's because of what's in the New York Times

Ironically, since Obama was elected, for the first time in my life I'm sometimes not proud of my country.

Where there's smoke around a conservative, there are journalists furiously rubbing two sticks together.

But all liberals only have empathy for the exact same victims - always the ones that are represented by powerful liberal interest groups.

By 1973, John Kerry had already accused American soldiers of committing war crimes in Vietnam, thrown someone else's medals to the ground in an anti-war demonstration, and married his first heiress.

Liberalism is part of a religious disorder that demands a belief that life is controllable.

Why don't Republicans spend all their airtime attacking the media for lying about what Obama's amnesty does and what the Democrats are doing? It's hard to avoid concluding that Republicans aren't trying to make the right arguments. In fact, it kind of looks like they're intentionally throwing the fight on amnesty. If a Republican majority in both houses of Congress can't stop Obama from issuing illegal immigrants Social Security cards and years of back welfare payments, there is no reason to vote Republican ever again.