A Wikipedia article is a process, not a product.

The whole, 'Is the internet a good thing or a bad thing'? We're done with that. It's just a thing. How to maximise its civic value, its public good - that's the really big challenge.

It is possible to think that the Internet will be a net positive for society while admitting that there are significant downsides - after all, it's not a revolution if nobody loses.

Curation comes up when search stops working.

Tools get socially interesting after they're no longer technologically interesting.

Society is not just the product of its individual members; it is also the product of its constituent groups.

Even with the sacred printing press, we got erotic novels 150 years before we got scientific journals.