It is possible to think that the Internet will be a net positive for society while admitting that there are significant downsides - after all, it's not a revolution if nobody loses.

Wikipedia [...] is the product not of collectivism but of unending argumentation.

The future presented by the internet is the mass amateurization of publishing and a switch from 'Why publish this?' to 'Why not?

We are moving from sharing to cooperation to collective action.

The transfer of [...] capabilities from various professional classes to the general public is epochal.

Trying to express implicit and fuzzy relationships in ways that are explicit and sharp doesn't clarify the meaning, it destroys it.

One of the best ways to know you're completely wrong, is to behave as if you're complete right.