Thought is creating divisions out of itself and then saying that they are there naturally.

The question of relevance comes before that of truth, because to ask whether a statement is true or false presupposes that it is relevant (so that to try to assert the truth or falsity of an irrelevant statement is a form of confusion).

Individuality is only possible if it unfolds from wholeness.

We have the idea that after we have been thinking something, it just evaporates. But thinking doesn't disappear. It goes somehow into the brain and leaves something-a trace-which becomes thought. And thought then acts automatically.

Can we learn to become more learning-oriented individually and collectively, rather than 'I know' oriented?

Real dialogue is where two or more people become willing to suspend their certainty in each other's presence.

Suppose we were able to share meanings freely without a compulsive urge to impose our view or conform to those of others and without distortion and self-deception. Would this not constitute a real revolution in culture.