From the fact that E is evidence for T and the fact that T entails M, it doesn't follow that E is evidence for M.

Our own species evolved under the influence of group selection, as Darwin emphasized when he discussed the evolution of altruism.

I disagree with the widely held view that it is metaphysical necessity, not nomological, that matters in the mind/body problem.

Just as thought experiments can't show that vitalism is true (or that it is false), they also can't show that dualism is true (or that it is false).

I don't endorse deism or interventionist theism. My point is just that evolutionary biology is logically compatible with the former and with some versions of the latter.

When I was in high school I found literature and history interesting, but science not at all. Literature and history obviously involved thinking, but science seemed to be all about memorizing facts and doing mindless calculations.

Scientists often seek predictively accurate models, rather than models that are true.