A technological advance of a major sort almost always is overestimated in the short run for its consequences - and underestimated in the long run.

One must dig deeply into opposing points of view in order to know whether your own position remains defensible. Iron sharpens iron.

It's not like you're closing the old doors and that investigators working away in a laboratories on a unique hypothesis are no longer needed. My gosh, they are indeed. But this becomes a real engine for hypothesis generation and even for proof if you have interventions that you can carry out in this kind of large scale and conduct them in a rigorous way. I guess, yeah, it's different. But it's different in a good way.

God is most certainly not threatened by science; He made it all possible.

By investigating God's majestic and awesome creation, science can actually be a means of worship.

I trained initially as a physical chemist, and then, after becoming interested in biology, I went to medical school and learned how to be a physician. So, I'm a physician scientist.

I'm aware there are certain products that are being advertised - food products - with 'no chemicals whatsoever.' Well, that would be pretty hard to arrange, since everything around us is made up of atoms and molecules - chemicals - including ourselves.