There's no way a photograph has to look... in a sense. There are no formal rules of design that can apply.

People are just dumb. They misunderstand.

Two people could look at the same flowers and feel differently about them. Why not? I'm not making ads. I couldn't care less.

Well, in terms of what a camera does. Again, you go back to that original idea that what you photograph is responsible for how it [the photograph] looks. And it's not plastic, in a way. The problem is unique in photographic terms.

The game, let's say, of trying to state photographic problems is, for me, absolutely fascinating.

I'm a photographer, a still photographer. That's it.

[Photography is ] likewise even French impressionists. So the Sculls bought pop. It was politics, and they moved with it. And I think that could be happening, to some degree, with photography, too. It doesn't cost as much to do it, either.