Although value is a weak force in any single year, it becomes a monster over several years. Like gravity, it slowly wears down the opposition.

You don't get rewarded for taking risk; you get rewarded for buying cheap assets. And if the assets you bought got pushed up in price simply because they were risky, then you are not going to be rewarded for taking a risk; you are going to be punished for it.

It is better to be lucky than good, but of course appropriate to aspire to both.

Capitalism believes that its remit is exclusively to make maximum short-term profits.

You don't actually find a strong correlation between- top-line GDP growth and making money in the market. It- it seems like you should. The fastest-growing countries should give you the highest return. They simply don't. But, there's only four of us- that- that believe that story. Everyone else in the world believes that if you grow fast like China, you'll outperform in the stock market.

Some societies are also more optimistic than others: the U.S. and Australia are my two picks Tell a European you think there’s a housing bubble and you’ll have a reasonable discussion. Tell an Australian and you’ll have World War III. Been there, done that!

I would say that financial markets are very inefficient, and capable of extremes of being completely dysfunctional.