The moment you put something down on paper it forces you to organize and arrange these thoughts a little better.

As a visual discourse, architecture requires trained individuals to work on the refined philosophical debates. School gave me the necessary training, and I've built on this based on my own aesthetics, as most do.

The moment you put something down on paper it forces you to organize and arrange these thoughts a little better.

To apply poetic license or to apply incorrect arrangements requires the idea or the understanding of correct arrangements - becoming an expert of the conventions of correct arrangements in order to misplace them. In other words, misplacing things with the understanding, or even the mastery, of normalcy is actually quite poetic. These are rule-based operations.

Morphology happens over time. It's not necessarily a bad thing.

I think of architecture as language, and I look within the intra-communication between architects.

I think regionalism was a little easier before mass communication was made possible. This is not to say that regionalism doesn't exist anymore. I think it does.