It is possible to construct small realities that contain political or philosophical responses, not necessarily just practical or economical responses.

The moment you put something down on paper it forces you to organize and arrange these thoughts a little better.

I believe architecture is a cultural output and I think Rem Koolhaas is one of the rare individuals who was able to really output architecture as cultural artifact.

Morphology happens over time. It's not necessarily a bad thing.

The role of architecture, in terms of communication, is not going to drastically change either.

If I were to arrive at a foreign country like Czech Republic, I don't have to speak Czech to understand the feeling of the local sensations through architecture. That is a kind of communication that no language can perform.

To apply poetic license or to apply incorrect arrangements requires the idea or the understanding of correct arrangements - becoming an expert of the conventions of correct arrangements in order to misplace them. In other words, misplacing things with the understanding, or even the mastery, of normalcy is actually quite poetic. These are rule-based operations.