It's important to write a mystery novel where the takeaway is not a giveaway - where something could be read over and over.

Architecture, in itself, at the end of the day, is a rational profession.

Unlike sciences, literature as art relies on societal acceptance of a certain vocabulary.

The moment you put something down on paper it forces you to organize and arrange these thoughts a little better.

I think architecture could be understood as the construction of realities, or the construction of worlds. One of the reasons why architects are often attracted to philosophers, partially, has to do with making sense of the world around us as well as the making of worlds, and in our case, the realities we create can be as real as concrete. These kinds of ideas, of wild imagination, go into the question of how you make a world.

As a visual discourse, architecture requires trained individuals to work on the refined philosophical debates. School gave me the necessary training, and I've built on this based on my own aesthetics, as most do.

In order for architecture to experience its ongoing evolution as a language, there has to be a lot of adjusted copies between how architects draw, think, engage bylaws and constraints.