To apply poetic license or to apply incorrect arrangements requires the idea or the understanding of correct arrangements - becoming an expert of the conventions of correct arrangements in order to misplace them. In other words, misplacing things with the understanding, or even the mastery, of normalcy is actually quite poetic. These are rule-based operations.

I believe architecture is a cultural output and I think Rem Koolhaas is one of the rare individuals who was able to really output architecture as cultural artifact.

The role of architecture, in terms of communication, is not going to drastically change either.

The idea of morphology of languages is something that I'm really interested in.

It's important to write a mystery novel where the takeaway is not a giveaway - where something could be read over and over.

The world is meaningless and therefore it's funny.

As a visual discourse, architecture requires trained individuals to work on the refined philosophical debates. School gave me the necessary training, and I've built on this based on my own aesthetics, as most do.