In order for architecture to experience its ongoing evolution as a language, there has to be a lot of adjusted copies between how architects draw, think, engage bylaws and constraints.

I think architecture could be understood as the construction of realities, or the construction of worlds.

I recently wrote a piece on comics in architecture - I was talking about the three kinds of comics I pay attention to: the Franco-Belgian, the Japanese manga, and the American comics. I started thinking about the relationship between Japanese manga and Japanese architecture, or Franco-Belgian bande dessinée versus Franco-Belgian architecture, it began to make sense; there are parallels to the modes of operations and the cultures they belong to. If I didn't force myself to write, I would have no forum to clarify these thoughts. Writing is really helpful.

The obsession was so real and so prolonged. Sleeping was kind of like taking breaks from continuing the obsession.

The diagram of the house is a portrait of the family, a true portrait, whether it's sad or happy.

Architecture, in itself, at the end of the day, is a rational profession.

The role of architecture, in terms of communication, is not going to drastically change either.