People create the illusion of acting natural, which is what I think most documentarians do in part because of the direct cinema orthodoxies that came into play really in the '60s. That moment of performance is a tremendous opportunity to make visible something hitherto invisible, which is how people want to be seen. How do they see themselves? What are the scripts, fantasies, genres by which they imagine themselves? How is storytelling part of what we are as human beings? We wouldn't kill each other en masse if it weren't for storytelling. We wouldn't be able to live with ourselves.

There's a tradition of reenactment in documentary which is about sort of illustrating what the past might have been like.

We lie to ourselves and try to escape that bitter reality by saying that the world is divided into good guys and bad guys, and that we're the good guys. We condemn people as evil to reassure us that we're not like them. If there's to be any hope of preventing these things from happening again, we have to look at the reality. That any act of evil in our history was committed by human beings like us. That, very often, we're all implicated in it.

I see myself as an explorer more than a storyteller.

Direct cinema is about simulating a reality in which you're not having the overwhelming influence that you really are having.

I need to trust myself and go where my instincts tell me, and to be as wild and free as possible in my creative decisions.

We can distance ourselves from the reality of what we did through storytelling.