It seems to me that responsiveness is a better source for understanding what moral claims are and how they work upon us.

Indeed it may be only by risking the incoherence of identity that connection is possible.

People need to know who I am and where I'm coming from.

The idea that speaking at all on the topic, demanding public space in which to have that debate, is itself an act of complicity with violence, and violence against Israelis, understood as synonymous with Jews, and so violence against Jews, clearly stops the speech with an unspeakable allegation.

Gender is an identity tenuously constituted in time, instituted in an exterior space through a stylized repetition of acts.

It's my view that gender is culturally formed, but it's also a domain of agency or freedom and that it is most important to resist the violence that is imposed by ideal gender norms, especially against those who are gender different, who are nonconforming in their gender presentation.

Perhaps the promise of phallus is always dissatisfying in some way.