Yes. The original argument is defective. Substitute the word 'male' for 'gay,' and you'll see the flaw: 'Male people cannot be normal. If everyone were male starting tomorrow, the human race would die out, so being male cannot be nature's intended way.' Or you could substitute the word 'female.' In either case, the argument makes no sense: Being male or female is perfectly normal.

A person who learns to juggle six balls will be more skilled than the person who never tries to juggle more than three.

Be able to draw an illustration as least well enough to get your point across to another person.

Relatively few of us will find the time-or take it-to live an ever enlarging life.

Know where to find the sunrise and sunset times and note how the sky looks at those times, at least once.

Although spoken English doesn't obey the rules of written language, a person who doesn't know the rules thoroughly is at a great disadvantage.

A fool is someone whose pencil wears out before its eraser does.