The phone's not ringing off the hook, but that's ok by me. I feel very fortunate, work to me has become a kind of hobby.

'Friends' was a true ensemble. There really was no star of the show.

The way I look at it, everything is a trade. You acquire some money, so then you've got no financial burdens, but everyone wants your money and so who can you trust? Or you've got no money and you can trust anyone, but then you've got the worry to pay bills. Which is worse?

Is it better to strive for success as a self-representing artist or try to get your feet wet in the gallery world? That is such a common question these days among artists. I truly believe that most artists will come to a cross road where they will have to decide on which route to take as it's extremely hard to be successful in both worlds.

I grew up in Boston, so it's a nice change to be cold after living in California.

You can't be funny if you don't have good material.

It's funny - nowadays people that are famous get chased by paparazzi. They have this fame, but they don't have the money to hide from it.