I'm not an expert in typefaces that serve scientific writing, but I'd guess that's another dozen or two.

Everyone can have an opinion on a logo.

Simplicity, wit, and good typography.

Most processes leave out the stuff no one wants to talk about: magic, intuition and leaps of faith.

Graphic design is the fiction that anticipates the fact.

I think that you could design a terrible logo for a good company with great people and they could build it into a great program. Alternatively you could design what seems to be a brilliant logo for people who are not smart or energetic or are incapable of associating with anything positive and it would become a terrible logo.

I think once the artistic world of the type designer merged with the scientific world of the computer programmer, you began to see this crossover.