I'm not an expert in typefaces that serve scientific writing, but I'd guess that's another dozen or two.

If you ask people in the US what logos they like and recognise, they'll name Target or Nike.

Sometimes I will give some very vague directions to the designer that I'm working with on a particular project and they'll come back and surprise me with something that really shows a lot of their own 'hand' in it. Other times I'll have a really clear idea about how I want it done and I'll draw it out pretty precisely and say 'make it look exactly like this' and it will be something where it looks like I can say it was 'fully my design'. The work can also range between the two.

No one loves authenticity like a graphic designer. And no one is quite as good at simulating it.

Most processes leave out the stuff no one wants to talk about: magic, intuition and leaps of faith.

When it comes to working on identities, a lot of the time I find myself working with a company that has been around for a while. No matter what they say their goal is, the history and the impression that they have already made in the minds of the public is a real thing that you have to deal with.

It's hard to predict what will happen as reading on screen becomes more of a universal norm, and when the formats dictated by social media - Twitter's 140-character limit, for instance - start to influence what we're used to.