I can use the camera to make a place or landscape; the camera to a greater extent projects rather than takes in or reproduces. The camera, or, rather, the eye, produces the impression of the place: I as a photographer am not passively taking in; I am active as a subject generating the object.

I don't know a single collector or museum director who says: 'Oh, he's on a list, so I think I'll buy something of his.' The people who buy my art put a little more thought into it than that.

I was interested in how we engage the world. How do we use our skin as our eyes? If you read a cityscape or a landscape with just your mind, and not your body, it becomes like a picture or representation, not something you really engage with.

My goal is to formulate a new color theory based on the full spectrum of visible light.

Photographs have a relevance for things that cannot be said.

I always try to make work that activates the viewer to be a co-producer of our shared reality.

I do not think making art alone makes it any better than making it with a team of people.