If we are concerned about the exploitation of human workers in countries with low standards of worker protection, we should also be concerned about the treatment of even more defenceless non-human animals.

Surely there will be some nonhuman animals whose lives, by any standards, are more valuable than the lives of some humans.

Interest in business ethics courses has surged, and student activities at leading business schools are more focused than ever before on making business serve long-term social values.

Personal purity isn’t really the issue. Not supporting animal abuse – and persuading others not to support it – is.

The notion that human life is sacred just because it is human life is medieval.

I do not believe that it could never be justifiable to experiment on a brain-damaged human.

I'm not overly alarmist about it, but I do think there are some worrying signs, like the growing accumulation of wealth by a very small proportion of the population, plus elections in the US are much more dominated by money than anywhere else calling itself a democracy.