Let's face it, the human eye is clumsy, sloppy, and unintelligible when compared to the camera's eye.

Some artists imagine they've got a hold on this apparatus, which in fact has got a hold of them. As a result, they end up supporting a cultural prison that is out of their control

One day the photograph is going to become even more important than it is now.... But I am not particularly an advocate of the photograph.

Objects in a park suggest static repose rather than any ongoing dialectic. Parks are finished landscapes for finished art .

Language should find itself in the physical world, and not end up locked in an idea in somebody's head

Artists are expected to fit into fraudulent categories.

A camera is wild in just about anybody's hands, therefore one must set limits. But cameras have a life of their own. Cameras care nothing about cults or isms. They are indifferent mechanical eyes, ready to devour anything in sight. They are lenses of the unlimited reproduction.