But the time has come for journalists to acknowledge that a zone of privacy does exist.

In exchange for power, influence, command and a place in history, a president gives up the bulk of his privacy.

No matter what name we give it or how we judge it, a candidate's character is central to political reporting because it is central to a citizen's decision in voting.

The written tone and the spoken tone change and the reporters' disbelief in the veracity of the government spreads to the readers and the viewers.

Most journalists now believe that a person's privacy zone gets smaller and smaller as the person becomes more and more powerful.

For decades, the journalistic norm had been that the private lives of public officials remained private unless that life impinged on public performance.

Journalists, who are skeptical to begin with, simply do not like to be lied to or made fools of.