In exchange for power, influence, command and a place in history, a president gives up the bulk of his privacy.

As electronic journalism came to be evaluated for its cost effectiveness, the network world began breaking up.

For decades, the journalistic norm had been that the private lives of public officials remained private unless that life impinged on public performance.

The ethics of editorial judgement, however, began to go though a sea change during the late 1970s and 80s when the Carter and Reagan Administrations de-regulated the television industry.

The relationship between press and politician - protected by the Constitution and designed to be happily adversarial - becomes sour, raw and confrontational.

Most journalists now believe that a person's privacy zone gets smaller and smaller as the person becomes more and more powerful.

But the time has come for journalists to acknowledge that a zone of privacy does exist.