Value investing is predicated on the efficient market hypothesis being wrong.

When managers are afraid of redemptions, they get liquid. We all saw how many managers went from leveraged long in 2007 to huge net cash in 2008, when the right thing to do in terms of value would have been to do the opposite.

Literally draw a detailed map-like an organization chart-of interlocking ownership and affiliates, many of which were also publicly traded. So, identifying one stock led him to a dozen other potential investments. To tirelessly pull threads is the lesson that I learned from Mike Price.

My view is that an investor is better off knowing a lot about a few investments than knowing a little about each of a great many holdings. One's very best idea's are likely to generate higher returns for a given level of risk than one's hundredth or thousandth best idea.

I find value investing to be a stimulating, intellectually challenging, ever changing, and financially rewarding discipline

I don't have a Bloomberg on my desk. I don't care.

Limit risk with: Deep analysis Bargain purchase Sensitivity analysis.