Science is about the process; it's not about the conclusion.

History is strewn with ideas that were intuitive and made sense at the time, but were also hopelessly wrong.

Anecdotes generate questions, not answers.

Creationists argue that natural selection is only a negative process, and therefore cannot create anything. Chopra argues that skepticism is only a negative process, and therefore does not lead to knowledge. Both are wrong for the same reasons. They ignore the generation of diversity and new ideas upon which natural selection and skepticism acts. Weeding out the unfit is critical to both - natural selection allows evolution to proceed, and skepticism allows science to advance.

Some claims deserve ridicule, and anything less falsely elevates them.

There is no skepticism without science and the scientific method. It's about how we know what we know.

Science is about the process; it's not about the conclusion.