The problem with opportunity cost is that opportunity cost is divided among many, many things.

The things that motivate us are to help other people, to feel that we're useful, to feel that we're getting better, to feel that we are kind of living to our potential, to get a sense of meaning. All of those things are positive.

Take a brilliant, creative social scientist, without any respect for conventional wisdom and you get Ellen Langer. She is a fantastic storyteller, and Counterclockwise is a fascinating story about the unexpected ways in which our minds and bodies are connected.

Brands communicate in two directions: they help us tell other people something about ourselves, but they also help us form ideas about who we are.

The more cashless our society becomes, the more our moral compass slips.

In the U.S., I think there is an ideology of not telling kids what to do. Nobody to tell you who to marry, not tell you what job to pick. You're your own person. You have the freedom to choose, including the freedom to fail in magnificent ways. And I think that's the big difference. In other countries there is basically a social norm about saving that is passed from generation to generation. In the U.S. there isn't.

I always found the appeal to the market gods a bit odd. Why would the market fix mistakes instead of aggravating them?