For me anyway when a photograph is interesting, it's interesting because of the kind of photographic problem it states - which has to do with the contest between content and form.

Museum of Modern Art doesn't have anything to do with what I do. Probably has made some differences in my sales, I wouldn't be surprised. Again, you have to ask other people, because I don't have a measuring device.

The only thing that happens when I'm teaching is that I hope there are some students out there in the class who will ask questions.

You've got a lot going for you, you see. By just describing well with it, something happens.

In the end, maybe the correct language would be how the fact of putting four edges around a collection of information or facts transforms it. A photograph is not what was photographed, it's something else.

It's the easiest thing in the world to do that, to make successful photographs. It's a bore.

I look at a photograph. What's going on? What's happening, photographically? If it's interesting, I try to understand why.