You could have a player that gave you some iffiness but his talent would make a real contribution, but you had to have an overwhelming base of players so you know exactly what you had.

We see every day that our very laws have both sides of the fence.

But if you look at teams that want to share more revenues, they're teams that don't have a lot on the table. They've long since not had any serious investment in their team.

Is [football] for everybody? Of course not. But it is a meaningful contribution beyond, I think, other alternatives.

You don't see young men walk out and say, "Hey, let's go knock the [stuff] out of each other." You say, "Let's hit some grounders. Let's play catch. Let's shoot some baskets."

There are a lot of people with money, but not with the passion to really go spend it.

I have never had a problem dealing in areas of ambiguity. I can make a decision and not have it all lined up just right.