When I would present my work as a student, often I would hear, "Your project is too formal" - it's too form-based; it's too form-driven. Which is kind of shocking for a visual practice, for someone to say something discouraging about a focus on an exploration of aesthetics.

The dining room is a building; the bathroom is a building. If we scatter this single-program architecture inside of a domestic environment, we can link an interior urbanism in a way similar to a village or a township of tiny houses.

It is possible to construct small realities that contain political or philosophical responses, not necessarily just practical or economical responses.

Morphology happens over time. It's not necessarily a bad thing.

Setting up absurd worlds with rules to violate - it's one of the things I hope to achieve with my work.

Every time I traveled to a new city, I would learn about local heroes I did not know about, and I would learn about their very impressive contribution to their cities.

I think architecture could be understood as the construction of realities, or the construction of worlds.