An utterance can have Intentionality, just as a belief has Intentionality, but whereas the Intentionality of the belief is intrinsic the Intentionality of the utterance is derived.

An utterance can have Intentionality, just as a belief has Intentionality, but whereas the Intentionality of the belief is intrinsic the Intentionality of the utterance is derived.

Where consciousness is concerned, the appearance is the reality.

The general nature of the speech act fallacy can be stated as follows, using "good" as our example. Calling something good is characteristically praising or commending or recommending it, etc. But it is a fallacy to infer from this that the meaning of "good" is explained by saying it is used to perform the act of commendation.

How do we get from electrons to elections and from protons to presidents?

Whatever is referred to must exist. Let us call this the axiom of existence.

Berkeley had a liberal element in the student body who tended to be quite active. I think that's in general a feature of intellectually active places.