Both cinematic culture and the culture at large have changed profoundly. We're now in post-cinematic digital culture, and the internet has obviously usurped movies, which are no longer central to our lives, at least not as a collective spectator experience.

In the digital economy, everything is archived, catalogued, readily available, and yet nothing really endures.

I am as much what I am because of what I still don't have as I am because of what I have had and what I might still have one day.

You have to have an eye and a feeling for where things go. Writing visually, writing textually, writing sonically. Text is visual for me and images are textual. There is power in the way ideas are arranged, not just developed rhetorically. Form is everything.

We don't experience things collectively or cathartically anymore. Viewing has become an intensely private, fetishistic, compulsive process that happens separately from others, and that reflects not only our relation to cinema as a space of possibility, belief, and imagination. But more generally, of what could be, of readiness, which is what the movies have historically been about - the ability to act on things and change.

The digital age is for me in many ways about temporal wounding. It's really messed up our ontological clocks.

The digital artwork is characterized not by the technology which delivers it, but by the "passage" itself.