Language should be an ever developing procedure and not an isolated occurrence.

Let's face it, the human eye is clumsy, sloppy, and unintelligible when compared to the camera's eye.

The museum spreads its surfaces everywhere, and becomes an untitled collection of generalizations that mobilize the eye.

Mistakes and dead-ends often mean more to these artists than any proven problem

Questions about form seem as hopelessly inadequate as questions about content.

There is something abominable about cameras, because they possess the power to invent many worlds. As an artist who has been lost in this wilderness of mechanical reproduction for many years, I do not know which world to start with. I have seen fellow artists driven to the point of frenzy by photography.

Art's development should be dialectical and not metaphysical.