It is of note that for a long time moral nihilism was a kind of unquestioned default position in analytic moral philosophy.

The democratic thought is based on that 'ordinary people' are suitable to rule themselves.

To kill or not to kill, that was the question that haunted me.

I wanted to know what it means to know something, whether we can know at all, and, if so, how.

It is of note that even if utilitarianism has proved to be superior to deontology and the libertarian moral rights theory in the area of killing, we are not allowed to say that it has been finally vindicated; it has to face other challenges in other areas, in particular in situations of distributive justice.

I do believe that what I have called populist democracy is to be preferred to what I have called elitist democracy.

We should not accept moral nihilism unless we find strong arguments to do so.