It's a very complicated landscape and I don't think there's one easy answer about it [Edard Snowden movie].

It makes sense that it's so different from film and television, because it's so in-depth. As actors, when we're in film or television, we can have transcendent moments and we get to work with really creative and incredible people, but it's such a small percentage of your time that's about your process.

If it was a biopic about Glenn Greenwald, I would have immersed myself more fully in his personal life and gotten to know him as much as I could, but because it was much more about his relationship to this particular situation, to The Guardian, to Laura Poitras, and to Ewen MacAskill, and Edward Snowden, I was able to really learn a lot about him from reading his book and reading his many articles and accounts of that time.

I find that communication as an actor and person is an important part of who I am. And I'm really drawn into the psychology of those dynamics.

I had to learn how to modulate my performances and interpretations of these roles in auditions for the camera.

Again, as a gay man I look at that and say there's a hopelessness that surrounds it, but as a human being I look at it and say 'Why? Where's this disparity coming from, and why can't we as a culture and society dig deeper to examine that?' We're terrified of facing ourselves.

I don't immerse myself in the Internet chatter because it opens you up to a whole source of danger.