A sign to me is a one-liner, a symbol is very complex and my house is a series of symbols.

But I do believe architecture, and all art, should be content-driven. It should have something to say beyond the sensational.

The rule seems to be that there are no absolutes, that what is rare is prized. Thus, in times of relative affluence, thin models become dominant.

A sign to me is a one-liner, a symbol is very complex and my house is a series of symbols.

It's a mark of any icon that it should be open to iconoclasm.

What is a garden if not a miniaturization and celebration, of the place we are in, the universe?

I was already writing about the idea of a 'multiverse' in the 1970s, though I might have called it the 'pluriverse.' How was I to know it would turn out to be the standard model? Actually, I consider myself an enlightenment fossil.