Many artists I enjoy have a large body of work, and eventually the message is derived out from the sum of its parts.

When I would present my work as a student, often I would hear, "Your project is too formal" - it's too form-based; it's too form-driven. Which is kind of shocking for a visual practice, for someone to say something discouraging about a focus on an exploration of aesthetics.

The obsession was so real and so prolonged. Sleeping was kind of like taking breaks from continuing the obsession.

Architectural drawing is a language with conventions where the rules can be deliberately misused; a well-composed architectural drawing can both contain correct and incorrect arrangements of meaningful things.

Unlike sciences, literature as art relies on societal acceptance of a certain vocabulary.

Architecture, in itself, at the end of the day, is a rational profession.

As a visual discourse, architecture requires trained individuals to work on the refined philosophical debates. School gave me the necessary training, and I've built on this based on my own aesthetics, as most do.