Yes, there may be some convergence to what you see on a screen that's different from the way you will experience a magazine in your hand, but there are lots of ways you can signal differences. Where native advertising and these other things get tricky is when the consumer can't tell the difference between edit and advertising.

I think there's still room for compelling voices to build up and get a great following.

You learn a lot from your customers, and when your customers are also your owners, you learn even more.

There are newsweeklies that are dead. Some may still be walking, but they're dead.

The issues for journalism and journalists, we see obvious places where presentation is very different in a digital space from traditional print. If you go to a New York Times homepage, you cannot get to a story about the Ukraine without a click-off on a banner ad or a slide show. They're not alone in that - you think you're clicking on a video about a news event and you have a 30-second ad that you have to watch before you can get to it.

The technology is not only the way we change stories, but also changing the relationship to the consumer.

I tend to be more interested in the trend pieces than who got a licensing deal for sunglasses, but that's not surprising.