It's going to sound strange probably. But I really like Frank Gehry's works.

The problem carbon is that everyone thinks we have an energy problem, we don't. We have plenty of energy. We have a carbon problem. Carbon is a material, so we have a material problem, not an energy problem.

We realized we don't have an invention, that's why we gave it away.

We prefer to talk about 100% renewable instead of zero carbon. When you say zero carbon, you are not positively defined.

If you don't like carbon, if you want to be zero carbon, then you might as well shoot yourself, dry up and blow away because you are carbon.

And to use something as elegant as a tree? Imagine this design assignment: Design something that makes oxygen, sequesters carbon, fixes nitrogen, distills water, makes complex sugars and foods, changes colors with the seasons, and self-replicates. and then why don't we knock that down and write on it?

It would be nice if all that exuberance and abundance was connected to a deep ethos of planetary responsibility.