I view my role now as providing more of a macro-level skepticism, rather than saying this poll is good or this poll is evil.

I've just always been a bit of a dork.

If I had a spreadsheet on my computer, it looked like I was busy.

Caesar recognized the omens, but he didn't believe they applied to him.

The Protestant Reformation had a lot to do with the printing press, where Martin Luther's theses were reproduced about 250,000 times. And so you had widespread dissemination of ideas that hadn't circulated in the mainstream before.

I prefer more to kind of show people different things than tell them 'oh, here's what you should believe' and, over time, you can build up a rapport with your audience.

First of all, I think it's odd that people who cover politics wouldn't have any political views.