I see architecture as a form of communication over time.

I recently wrote a piece on comics in architecture - I was talking about the three kinds of comics I pay attention to: the Franco-Belgian, the Japanese manga, and the American comics. I started thinking about the relationship between Japanese manga and Japanese architecture, or Franco-Belgian bande dessinée versus Franco-Belgian architecture, it began to make sense; there are parallels to the modes of operations and the cultures they belong to. If I didn't force myself to write, I would have no forum to clarify these thoughts. Writing is really helpful.

I think of architecture as language, and I look within the intra-communication between architects.

It's important to write a mystery novel where the takeaway is not a giveaway - where something could be read over and over.

The idea of morphology of languages is something that I'm really interested in.

One of the reasons why architects are often attracted to philosophers, partially, has to do with making sense of the world around us as well as the making of worlds.

I think architecture could be understood as the construction of realities, or the construction of worlds.