All I know is that I have way more stuff that I want to write about than I possibly have time to.

On average, people should be more skeptical when they see numbers. They should be more willing to play around with the data themselves.

I have to make sure that I make good choices and that if I put my name on it, it's a high-quality endeavor and that I have time to be a human being.

Every four years in the presidential election, some new precedent is broken.

We want to get 80%-85% of predictions right, not 100%. Or else we calibrated our estimates in the wrong way.

A lot of journalism wants to have what they call objectivity without them having a commitment to pursuing the truth, but that doesn't work. Objectivity requires belief in and a commitment toward pursuing the truth - having an object outside of our personal point of view.

I don't think you should limit what you read.